French Eco-nut: “We should limit our births so we can better receive the migrants who are knocking at our doors”


Yves Cochet co-founded the Green Party in 1984. He was the French environment minister from 2001 to 2002 and a member of the French parliament from 1997 to 2011.

He recently gave an interview to the French left-wing newspaper Le Nouvel Observateur.

France has one of the highest birth-rates of any white country (if it still qualifies), partly because of the strong African demographic there, but also because the state offers generous subsidies for families with children.

Cochet wants these to be scaled back.

Do we need to put the brakes on demographic growth to save the climate?

(…) We also need to take demography into account. It’s a truism to say: to reduce the number of inhabitants on the earth, we need to make fewer children.

Do we need to limit births?

(…) I suggest reversing our policy that encourages births, by inverting the logic of benefits payments for families. The more children you have, the fewer benefits you receive to the point of disappearing entirely after the third birth!

Does France need to make the most effort?

When we accept being “Neo-Malthusians”, we are quickly accused of racism and elitism. For that reason therefore, I make it clear that I am not targeting the poorest countries, which produce more children than others. On the contrary. The rich countries are the first that need to decrease demographically. They are the ones with the most polluting lifestyles.

In addition, limiting our births would allow us to better receive the migrants who are knocking at our doors.


18 thoughts on “French Eco-nut: “We should limit our births so we can better receive the migrants who are knocking at our doors”

  1. No, it is the rest of the world who are the greatest polluters of the environment, especially China and India and the African peoples contribute nothing positive to themselves nor to the rest of the world. It is these lot who need to be scaled down in their demographies. The race traitor cannot quite bring himself to yet mention that euthanasia is the next on the list of favoured reduction steps but, rest assured, the Dutch are well into that tactic and are very into ‘assisted suicides’ and, when the would be suicide is rather hesitant, the Dutch simply ignore the person’s wish to live and get on with “saving the planet” or “making room for the new inhabitants of Europe” or whatever they are calling murder nowadays.


  2. 38 percent of newborn in France are already non-white, those percentages are increasing with every year, so maybe he should limit only the minorities if he wants to stop population growth.

    Liked by 1 person

  3. My gawd…..that is just blatant anti-white hatred masquerading as concern for the environment and poor. How the HELL does importing gazillions of useless turd world invaders into your nation help the environment? They need housing. They will clog up the roads and put pressure on the infrastructure. More land will need to be cleared. Again-how does immigration help the environment? I’m all ears…

    Liked by 1 person

    1. i asked that very question to a greens promoter at the last election and she mumbled some shit about refugees and feelings.


  4. Of course, the interviewer does not ask the obvious question: if reducing native births will slow pollution, won’t allowing migrants with high birthrates into developed, high-polluting countries increase pollution?

    Liked by 1 person

  5. As a leftist on some issues, I used to admire how the Greens spoke out in defense of animals, the environment and workers rights. I loved how they USED to be opposed to foreign war’s that don’t concern us……but they lost me at ‘refugees are welcome’ and gay marriage. White births are bad for the environment, but apparently, brown births are good for it? I’ve missed something here.


    1. “how the Greens spoke out in defence of animals”….Ever heard a Green speak out against Halal or Kosher slaughter which is done to millions of animals, throughout the world, every day? Nope, me neither. The Greens ‘defence of animals’ consists of attacking people who wear furs because they see it as a ‘social class’ issue, not because they care about animals. PETA in the US was charged and found guilty of killing thousands of kittens and puppies immediately on being given them by silly fools who thought PETA would care for them. Or they do their best to sabotage research laboratories if the latter use animals as part of their tests; never heard of a greenie offering to take the place of a lab rat or rabbit.


      1. @Anonymous

        Their hatred of white people and culture is greater than their love of the natural world. They may as well change their name to the Browns party and be done with.


  6. what do you get if you feed a million starving africians? 10 million starving africians.
    what do you get if you feed 10 million starving africians? 100 million starving africians.
    what do you get if you feed 100 million starving africians? 1 billion starving africians.
    what do you get if you feed 1 billion starving africians?

    Liked by 1 person

    1. Exactly! I remember being told not to feed stray animals or they will keep coming back and expect more food. Seems like that’s what is going on in all white nations. Feed these illegal aliens and they won’t stop coming.


    2. @Jewbanker

      Todays starving Africans that we feed are tomorrows criminals, welfare recipients, murderers, rapists and drug peddlers in the West who will third worldize us.
      Todays ‘refugees’= tomorrows majority.


  7. This is just another idea of getting rid of all European boarders. It is no secret that the EU wants a boarder less society where you can travel across Europe without a passport from country to country, but there is the catch. There won’t be countries like France or Germany or holland as it will be one big country with the EU in charge of it all, so if you don’t like it here then you can move over there. You can see it happening now with the refugees trying to get to the USA through Mexico. How many countries did they gave to go through the without them going through a passport control. As for that minister in France, he should keep his stupid opinions to himself and keep the African refugees in Africa


  8. What is he smoking???? , seen lunatics in my life but that is out of this reality ! I can give addresses of few Psychiatrist may help but it may be too late.


  9. Real fruit-cake!!!! i suspect very unhappy life, sad really that has public voice, and been minister that is really sick !!!!


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s