A mood of black despair has settled on me in the last few days. I’m not sure there is a peaceful way out of the predicament we’re in. We await a catastrophic meltdown of the existing order of things, a civil war, as perhaps our only chance of surviving. But given the pace of demographic shifts, they will probably come to late to make a difference.
Wherefore this gloom? A combination of things.
First, back-to-back debates in the House of Parliament about bombing Syria and then the so-called Windrush Generation.
Observing these debates, it’s clear that there is no subject that can inspire such genuine emotion in the British ruling class as the interests of brown-skinned foreigners.
Even leaving aside the growing indications (video) that the chemical attack never took place at all, no one asks the most important questions, foremost of which is: Who the fuck cares? Why are we supposed to care about some brown people killing some other brown people? Why is it our responsibility to help them? What makes this particular set of brown people so special when all across the world, everywhere brown people live in fact, they create poverty, misery, violence, unfreedom and death. You could stick a pin in a map almost anywhere in the brown world and you would find comparable conditions to Douma.
The so-called Windrush Scandal has been a major blow to my psyche. A bunch of Caribbean Africans invaded Britain at a time when there was no legal distinction between the actual British population and the subjects of their empire. With a slight tightening of the rules in recent years, these undocumented brown people now find themselves unable to access benefits, get free treatment from the National Health Service and so on. Some may have died from lack of health care; some may have been deported. Now this would all have been good if it had been a matter of deliberate ruthlessness; instead, it was caused only by incompetence.
The Prime Minister has personally apologised to the invading Afro-Caribbeans, fulsomely thanked them for invading Britain and declared to Parliament that they were “as British as we are”.
Two aspects of this episode I have found especially distressing. The first is the rewriting of history. Everywhere, on the news, in Parliament, it is proclaimed that “we invited these people to come”. As I pointed out in an earlier article, this is completely false. The government of the day was appalled by the arrival of these unwanted blacks. Yet the falsehood goes completely unchallenged in the public sphere. History is rewritten in front of our eyes, within the lifespan of the people who lived it.
But the severest blow of all is that official public sympathy for these invaders, or the claim that they are British, is unopposed, not only by mainstream conservatives (the Daily Mail, etc.) but even the Far Lite.
Those who had vested their hopes in Jacob Rees-Mogg as a potential true conservative successor to Theresa had them brutally dashed this week.
First, he jumped on the “Enoch was Wrong” bandwagon. (What was he wrong about? The only thing he got wrong was to understate the speed of demographic change.)
<blockquote class=”twitter-tweet” data-lang=”en-gb”><p lang=”en” dir=”ltr”>My father’s view which has stood the test of time about Enoch Powell’s famous speech <a href=”https://t.co/WoHQPnogLP”>pic.twitter.com/WoHQPnogLP</a></p>— Jacob Rees-Mogg (@Jacob_Rees_Mogg) <a href=”https://twitter.com/Jacob_Rees_Mogg/status/985180625656254464?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw”>14 April 2018</a></blockquote>
Then he, too, forfeited his last shreds of conservative credibility by expressing sympathy for the well-tanned “Britons” of the Windrush Generation.
<blockquote class=”twitter-tweet” data-lang=”en-gb”><p lang=”en” dir=”ltr”>All British citizens must be treated equally and the Home Office needs to think of the individuals concerned not its own administrative convenience <a href=”https://t.co/xNhra6FdUe”>https://t.co/xNhra6FdUe</a></p>— Jacob Rees-Mogg (@Jacob_Rees_Mogg) <a href=”https://twitter.com/Jacob_Rees_Mogg/status/986184124661731329?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw”>17 April 2018</a></blockquote>
Here, “dangerous right-wing extremist” Anne-Marie Waters, leader of “For Britain” gets all weepy about the poor, distressed blacks who didn’t get their full quota of free stuff, courtesy of the British taxpayer.
After that, came a “debate” in Parliament about so-called Antisemitism in the Labour party. Can it even be called a debate when only one side is allowed to speak?
Strip away the verbiage what are we left with? Powerful Jews, and their pathetic minions like John Mann, are upset about plebs talking back to them. They demand that pleb free speech be suppressed. And the ruling class of Britain, moved to tears by these Semitic victimhood narratives, nod their heads in silent assent. An elite consensus now exists that “something must be done” about hurty words on the internet.
The most amazing thing about this is that it is based on nothing. Jewish researchers scour obscure corners of the internet for derogatory remarks about Jews that they can then use as ammunition to discredit their opponents. It would not surprise me at all if Jews were the ones making the anti-Semitic comments themselves, using pseudonyms, to help drive their agenda forward.
Labour MP Chris Williamson claimed to have evidence that “right-wing trolls” were masquerading as Labour party supporters to make nasty comments about Jews. I strongly suspect some of these right-wing trolls may have long and curvy noses.
77% of Labour members think the Jews are concocting bogus accusations of anti-Semitism to harm Corbyn (because he is supportive of Palestinians and critical of Israel). Lead Judenknecht John Mann says these people should be expelled from the party, that is not just those guilty of “antisemitism” but those who question the seriousness of the “antisemitism” problem.
Let’s put this in perspective. As of June 2017, the Labour Party had 552,000 members. 77% of that is 425,000. There are only between 200,000 – 300,000 Jews in Britain. So, to appease the Jews, Labour is being asked to expel a membership larger than the entire Jewish population of the country.
Factor in that Labour only got an estimated 13% of the Jewish vote at the last general election, which would amount only to around 15,000-20,000 votes, assuming normal abstention levels.
Labour has endured years of destabilisation thanks to its internal Jewish and Judophile fifth column, all for a measly 15,000 votes!
The most depressing thing about all of this is there is no pushback at all. The people accused of violating the tenets of equality don’t say “Fuck the tenets of equality”; they respond by affirming them even more strongly.
Conservatives, accused of being harsh to Caribbean immigrants, don’t say “Fuck those black bastards! We’re well rid of them.” They say, “They’re as British as we are. We thank them for their service to Britain. We apologise for this terrible injustice they’ve suffered and promise to offer them compensation.”
Labour, accused of being anti-Semitic, doesn’t say “Fuck these lying kikes. We don’t care what they think. They don’t vote for us anyway. Let them accept free speech or make their Aliyah and give us peace.” Instead, they suspend anyone the Jews accuse and say “We must work together tackle the scourge of anti-Semitism.”
How does this end? Where is there a way out? The Conservatives are a joke. Labour is a joke. Mogg is a joke. UKIP is a joke. For Britain is a joke. It’s a sad day when you have to hope for a civil war or a cataclysmic breakdown of public order as your only real chance for positive change.