One of the world’s top Jews, Ronald S. Lauder, president of the World Jewish Congress, gave $1.1 million dollars of his own money to an organisation called Secure America Now, which produced anti-Islam adverts to run on American TV.
Pretty good propaganda. I’d pay for this myself. So what’s the problem? The problem is that this same Jew has used his position to denounce just about every attempt by Europeans to form a political organisation to deal with the Islamic problem.
In France, he congratulated Macron on defeating Marine Le Pen.
In Germany, he denounced the AfD and called for it to be outlawed.
“It is abhorrent that the AfD party, a disgraceful reactionary movement which recalls the worst of Germany’s past and should be outlawed, now has the ability within the German parliament to promote its vile platform,” Lauder said.
In Austria, he smeared the FPO and called on its coalition partner Kurz to distance himself from them and limit their influence.
More evidence of the staggering hypocrisy of the Jews? No doubt. It seems European patriotism is only to be permitted when it is firmly under kosher control.
It is, of course, far more than mere hypocrisy, it is a classic example of a well-known and very useful political and social ploy, used by many groups, not only jews, although they seem most adept at it, of “playing both ends against the middle”: on the one hand fomenting agitation and (this is crucial) the false notion that there is a concerted and concerned opposition to a problem (in this case, Islam and Moslem presence in the West) whilst, on the other hand, denouncing such supposedly concerted and concerned opposition. We know that most of the so-termed ‘counterjihad’ are largely staffed, funded and agenda-driven by jews and, coupled with the propaganda positing jews as only ever ‘eternal victims’, people are primed to draw back from necessary action, or even speech, fearing that they will be lumped with ‘extremists.’
This “playing both ends against the middle” is part of Talmudic double-speak, to be taking two opposite positions at the same time, but the aim is to keep non-jews in a constant state of gravitating to an organisation which appears to be helpful, and then being repulsed by jewish denouncement of said organisation, and then being led on to the next, fruitless, round of supporting yet another bogus ‘movement’, whilst all the enemies within get on with strengthening their own forces and sources of ever-increasing power over people.
LikeLiked by 1 person
“ahead of a major rally against anti-semitism”
I would like to sound a warning bell: in Britain the newspapers have spent weeks lambasting the leader of the Labour Party, Jeremy Corbyn, over alleged ‘antisemitism’ on his part and that of members of his party. One could dismiss most of this as political power plays between Tories (the political party presently in power) and the Opposition party (Labour) and elections are coming up. BUT, last week the ‘Chief Rabbi’ of the jews in britain declared he would be making a statement in the next few weeks about a new ‘initiative’ to deal with ‘antisemitism.’ Theresa May, present Prime Minister, met with the Chief Rabbi the same evening she was originally appointed to the leadership position by outgoing leader, Cameron, and some weeks later it was announced by the British government that it had signed up to a ‘working definition’ of ‘antisemitism’ which, reading between the lines, is meant to restrict free speech by not speaking of certain ‘stereotypes’ about jews nor comparing their actions to others, such as ‘nazis’, and also taking a contorted position about the state of Israel. This does not yet have the power of statutory law but, given previous history (in the jewish-dominated leadership of the Soviet Union) where antisemitism was deemed a crime punishable by death, and that May is dependent on jewish finance and support (as is Corbyn who has his own coterie of such), this ‘initiative’ could be part of a government and jewish organisations agreement to proceed with declaring ‘antisemitism’ a crime and then free speech will effectively have been stopped in Britain (and the jews are trying to get this approved at the EU and likely the UN too). The historic role of the British Board of Jewish Deputies in proposing what is called publicly ‘hate speech laws’, and having these proposals put forward to the House of Commons by various jewish Home Secretaries, from 1965 onwards, does mean there is a historical pattern of jewish control and influence over successive British governments.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Jews are looking after their best interests: (a) use Islam to bring about the fall of white Christian Europe and (b) keep the United States, with its large Jewish population, as Muslim-free as possible. It’s known as having your gefilte fish and eating it. Mark Steyn, writing for a Jewish audience: ‘Some of us think an Islamic Europe will be easier for America to deal with than the present Europe of cynical, wily, duplicitous pseudo-allies. But getting there is certain to be messy, and violent.’
LikeLiked by 1 person
You may remember that back in 2015 Ron Lauder chided the factions in Germany that opposed taking in the Muslim “refugees”. http://newobserveronline.com/world-jewish-congress-and-official-german-jewry-welcomes-nonwhite-invasion/
LikeLike