To justify their censorship of the goyim, Jews assiduously cultivate the meme that “free speech leads to violence”. We should respond with the counter-meme that “Censorship costs lives”.
It’s now clear that Nasim Najafi Aghdam was driven to murderous rage by Youtube’s censorship policies.
The fact that she was a crazy, brown-skinned, vegan leftist makes her ideal for us, since she can’t remotely be connected with the Alt Right, despite the desperate efforts of the MSM to establish an association.
A serious case can be made that lack of free speech has been a strong motivator in other incidents of terrorist violence.
In their video manifesto (below in German), the National Socialist Underground (who killed 10 people, mostly Turks) in Germany, said:
“The National Socialist Underground is a network of comrades with the principle: Actions instead of words. Until fundamental changes occur in politics, press and freedom of opinion, the activities will continue.”
Breivik’s manifesto is filled with concern about censorship. His first attack was against a media company for that very reason.
If the future of our countries is shaped by politics, and our politics is shaped by public discourse, those who are denied the right to participate in public discourse have effectively been reduced to the status of non-persons, a helot class. They pay their taxes but are not allowed to decide how the taxes are allocated. They can passively observe the ship of state being steered by other persons but are not allowed to participate in conversations about what the destination should be. But why should anyone accept being reduced to the status of a helot? It is unsurprising if some people respond to this degradation with violence.
The censorship of free expression leads to fatalities. Public discussion can be a vent for frustration. When the vent is closed, bottled-up anger finds another outlet.
Free speech for a peaceful world.
Agreed with all your points; however, one must realise that our enemies within also understand this and are deliberately restricting freedom of speech as a means to shut down our thought processes and that there is a key advantage to them in creating this frustration over our restricted free speech and free thoughts which is that they actually want to produce such violent reactions in order to respond with full force of arms (in every sense) against those people who still have enough logic and articulation to react against this totalitarianism. It is a way of their being able to draw out those amongst the people who can still pose a danger to their plans and eliminating them, and justifying it to the remaining multitude as dealing with ‘extremists’ whose actions would ‘destroy social cohesion and peace.’
LikeLike
Another “mass shooter” that just conveniently “goes crazy” , writes a nutty “manifesto” on Facebook or elsewhere, who shoots a bunch of “total strangers”, who is an “oddball loner” with no friends, co-workers or hardly any family members so every path of questioning leads to a dead end and/or who also ends up dead themselves so they can’t be questioned either, with “gun control” proposed just days or even hours after the “attack”. How convenient. You could almost say it was a formula. This also happens at a crucial time when a big debate is going on about YouTube and its sandboxing and censoring of videos. What a coincidence!
Of course this time, they’re going to go after the “free speech nuts”, too and build a case that free speech is “dangerous” now, so we need (((regulations))). Of course, the Hitler quote at the bottom of the “manifesto” was just the cheery on top. Gotta keep the holocaust conditioning reinforced, too.
LikeLike