The so-called Radical Right Gender Gap, the difference between male-female voting intentions for anti-immigration parties is hugely apparent in Swedish election polling.
In this graphic showing male voting intentions, we see that the “far-right” Sweden Democrats (shown in yellow) are by far the favourites, 8 points ahead of the Socialists.

But the female vote picture is completely different. Here the Socialists are the top party and the Sweden Democrats only come third. Female support for the Sweden Democrats is only half that of men.

The good news is that the Sweden Democrats top the poll of voting intentions among the youngest (18-35) age group of both sexes.
Sweden, YouGov poll:
Age group: 18-34
SD-EFDD: 19%
M-EPP: 18%
S-S&D: 17%
C-ALDE: 11%
V-LEFT: 9%
MP-G/EFA: 7%
Fi-S&D: 4%
KD-EPP: 4%
L-ALDE: 3%Field work: 16/03/18 – 19/03/18
Sample size: unrevealed— Europe Elects (@EuropeElects) 30 March 2018
H/T: SwedishChef
For more on this theme, see “The Problem with Feminism: Why Feminization leads to third-worldization“
This is actually very good news. We tend to view matters from a very negative viewpoint, particularly since we are aware of so many facts, and factors, of which the general public is deliberately left in the dark by Media and Academia, as well as Politicians.
But, since “the future belongs to those who show up for it,” we should see the youth vote as quite significant and our efforts should be deployed in providing them with as much information, IN DETAIL, as possible. This detailed aspect should be stressed because ‘catch phrases’ are not sufficient; youth not only need to know of the past, they need to see how what is shaping up now will impact so emphatically on them personally, and in the very near future.
In the end, the Truth wins. It is Easter today, think on how His disciples thought, until this day, that all they had learnt from Him had been in vain, and yet, today was only the Beginning…
LikeLike
Many people have been wondering when the Swedish Golden Dawn would show up. Well the Nordic Resistance Movement is here now and the jews and moslems will be fleeing soon.
nordfront.se
LikeLike
Your data don’t support your headline. The fact that twice as many men as women voted for SD at these low levels does not mean a 2:1 ratio can be expected if and when the party begins to capture a larger share of the vote.
In the 2016 POTUS election, you can see that the male vote for Trump is always 10% higher than the the cohort female vote.
Working-class White men: 71%
Working-class White women: 61%
College-grad White men: 53%
College-grad White women: 44%
Overall, educational attainment (i.e. University indoctrination) is a better predictor of White voting preferences than sex. The gap between educational attainment within one sex (17% and 18%) is much larger than the sex gap within each educational group (9% and 10%).
White working class: 66%
White college graduates: 48%
https://www.cnn.com/election/2016/results/exit-polls
If the results in Sweden look different, consider the possibility that lack of free speech might be the cause.
https://www.cnn.com/election/2016/results/exit-polls (scroll down to find the appropriate charts).
LikeLike
The two to one ratio between men and women who would vote SD remained through the years even as the SD party became more and more popular.
Sweden is not the US thus US data is not relevant for the situation there.
As for the situatuion in the US, the difference between white women who voted for Trump and those who voted for Clinton is only 9 percent (52 vs 43 percent), a ratio of 1,2 to 1 – very close. The difference between white men who voted for Trump and those who voted for Clinton is large – 31 percent (62 vs 31 percent), a ratio of 2 to 1.
So there is already quite big difference in the US between the white male and white female vote.
LikeLike
“The two to one ratio between men and women who would vote SD remained through the years even as the SD party became more and more popular.”
Where might I find those data? I don’t know Swedish.
“Sweden is not the US this US data is not relevant for the situation here.”
If you are going to claim that the alt-Right shouldn’t try to appeal to women because of their immutable nature, then data about White women’s voting patterns are relevant regardless of the country the data come from, unless you are claiming that Swedish women and US White women are different by nature.
“As for the situation in the US, …a ratio of 2:1.
The 52% to 43% vote masks a very large difference between college graduate White women and non-graduate White women. The former voted 61% for Trump compared to 44% for the latter group, so obviously nature is not wholly responsible for White women’s voting decisions. Inculturation is at least as important. Absent university indoctrination, White women preferred Trump by a massive landslide, very nearly the same 2:1 ratio as the overall White male vote.
You also have to remember that the media demonized and ridiculed Trump ruthlessly for months on end, yet still he won White women as a whole and working-class White women by a landslide. Even among college grad women, he won 44%. That is an astounding show of ethnic solidarity among these women when you consider the four years of anti-White (male especially) indoctrination they endured. Imagine what these vote totals would have looked like if we had an neutral media. These stats are not consistent with the view that women are incorrigible xenophiles and traitors who will never support the ethnocentric Right.
The most you can say is that it is easier to override women’s natural ethnocentrism than is the case for men. Remember, the more White women’s votes a party gets, the fewer White men’s votes they need. It is better to win 40% of White women and 55% of White men than 25% of White women and 65% of White men. In the end, the total vote is all that matters. This remains true even if a majority of Swedish women will never support SD. In the US, the Democrats knew they couldn’t win a majority of the White working-class men’s votes, so they jumped to the conclusion that they should ignore them altogether and even insult them. They paid the price and now we have President Trump.
It would really help us a great deal if Whites (including men) would stop falling for divide and conquer headgames.
LikeLike