A mulatto or possibly quadroon writing in National Review argues that, even if blacks have lower IQs on average (they do, see below) it’s pointless to research this area as it serves no purpose. It is a piece devoid of science and fact but rather resorts to anecdote, appeals to emotion and narcissistic navel gazing to make its point.
Remember, whites think that because they don’t follow in-group interests and can maintain a high degree of impartiality when talking about controversial matters that therefore all people are equally impartial and objective. Time and again we learn this is patently false and that non-whites will always turn discussion away from inquiry and toward advocating self-censure.
The overall theme of the piece is this:
There is, however, a question that those claiming black people are genetically predisposed to have lower IQs than others fail to answer: What, precisely, would we gain from discussing this particular issue?
What would we gain from discussing the fact blacks have, on average, an IQ well below whites and East Asians? We could stop affirmative action programs for one, since shoehorning woefully unqualified people into jobs just to make them more diverse will invariably end up harming the quality of that job’s output.
We would also stop with the lunacy of importing sub-Saharan Africans thinking they’ll not only thrive in our technologically advanced, high skilled societies but also help pay for our pensions and welfare.
Note that this is African American IQs, their average IQ is 85 thanks to white and Native American admixture. Sub Saharan blacks fare much worse, just take a gander at this site: