Did London Bridge jihadis deliberately target white people?

It’s a sign of how invaded our countries are that when jihad attacks occur, many of the people caught up in them aren’t even members of the indigenous population. For example, 30 of the 84 people killed in the Nice attack were Muslims. Most of the people killed in the Munich attack seem to have been BAME or, if you prefer the old-fashioned terminology, darkies. (link)

In the London Bridge attack, only 1 of the 8 people who died were British. None were brown-skinned, although the photograph of the one said to be “British” (James McMullan) does look a bit suspicious (second from bottom right).

According to the local government, around 40% of the population of London is brown.

The Greater London Authority (GLA) calculates that 3.3 million Londoners classify themselves as Black and Minority Ethnic (BME), around 40% of the 8.2 million people living in the capital. In fact, the GLA estimates that “the proportion of the population that is BME is projected to reach 50% by the mid-2030s.”

More recent reports put the figure even higher. Here, for example, is an article claiming London is 44% brown.

Were the murderers deliberately targeting white people? Given the statistics, that must be considered a serious possibility. We know that in the Bataclan attack, brown-skinned people were deliberately spared (link), and I suggested at the time that the choice of concert to attack (rock music) was intended to maximise the yield of white people.

There is a racial element to these jihad attacks that the Establishment is going out of its way to conceal.